
The once great ideal of friends with benefits (FWB) has been reported by
this New York Times article as not being all that it's cracked up to be. In other words, someone always gets the short end of the stick in this so-called relationship. Sure, as FWB you are friends, but the stress of possible falling for someone who isn't interested in you can really suck!
I've been there. Back in school, there was this cute drummer my friend introduced me to. We started hanging out and catching late night movies, but it was never identified as a "relationship." We were just good friends. After realizing he didn't want a gf, I made my think I didn't want a bf either, but it was too late. I already liked him past the idea of friendship.
The article goes to say that in some instances, some FWB remain FWB, while others either sever both the benefits and the friendship, or just remain friends without the benefits. I'm still friends with the drummer even though over benefits haven't been discussed for the year.

In all instances, FWB have the option of less committed relations, but is all that stress worth it?
Chatboard (0)